BALEAP law SIG

BALEAP law SIGBALEAP law SIGBALEAP law SIG
  • Home
  • ABOUT
  • COMMITTEE
  • EVENTS
  • BLOG
  • RESOURCES
  • More
    • Home
    • ABOUT
    • COMMITTEE
    • EVENTS
    • BLOG
    • RESOURCES

BALEAP law SIG

BALEAP law SIGBALEAP law SIGBALEAP law SIG
  • Home
  • ABOUT
  • COMMITTEE
  • EVENTS
  • BLOG
  • RESOURCES

Downloads

Files coming soon.

Recommended Reading

Allison, N., 2020. Impediments to the adoption of subject specific reading strategies in EAP–exploratory practice with Hohfeld’s Jural Relations. Language Scholar. 

Balkin, J. M., & Levinson, S., 2006. Law & the humanities: An uneasy relationship. Daedalus, 135(2), pp. 105–115 

Bhatia, V. K., 1989. Legislative writing: A case of neglect in EA/OLP courses.
English for Specific Purposes, 8, pp.223–238. 

Bond, B., 2020. Making language visible in the university. Multilingual Matters. 

Bruce, N., 2002. Dovetailing language and content: teaching balanced argument in legal problem answer writing. English for Specific Purposes, 21(4), pp.321-345. 

Bruce, I., 2011.Theory and concepts of English for academic purposes. Basingstoke: Palgrave  
Macmillan.
Candlin, C.N., Bhatia, V.K. and Jensen, C.H., 2002. Developing legal writing materials for English second language learners: Problems and perspectives. English for Specific Purposes, 21(4), pp.299-320. 

Ding, A. and Bruce, I., 2017. The English for academic purposes practitioner. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Donnarumma, D. and Blyth, E., 2017. ‘An evaluation of an online, in-sessional English for Legal Studies course in Bangladesh.’ In J. Kemp (Ed.) EAP in a Rapidly Changing Landscape: issues, challenges and solutions. Proceedings of the 2015 BALEAP Conference. Reading: Garnet, pp. 205-216. 

Griffiths, C., 2021. The law schools’ “easy win”? Improving law students’ experience through embedded and non-embedded writing support. The Law Teacher, 55(3), pp.377-391. 

Kemp, J., 2018. ‘A rosy-fingered dawn for legal education? Insights from a corpus linguistic perspective on text’. Nottingham Law Journal, 27(2), pp. 82-94. 

Marin, M., Orts Llopis, M. and Fitzgerald, A., 2017. ‘A data-driven learning experiment in the legal English classroom using the FLAX platform.’ Miscelánea: a Journal of English and American Studies, 55, pp. 37-64

Northcott, J. and Brown, G., 2006. Legal translator training: Partnership between teachers of English for legal purposes and legal specialists. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), pp.358-375. 

Northcott, J., 2006. Law and language or language and law? In Bartol, D., Duszak, A., Izdebski, H. and Pierrel, J. Langue, Droit, Société. [ Cahiers du DNPS]. Nancy-Université. 

Northcott, J., 2009. ‘Teaching Legal English: Contexts and Cases’.In Belcher, D. ed. English for  
Specific Purposes in Theory and Practice. [Michigan ELT] Michigan: University of Michigan Press:  
pp. 165-185. 

Preshous, A. and Kemp, J., 2017. Exploiting corpora to address the discipline-specific vocabulary needs of students. In J. Kemp. ed. EAP in a Rapidly Changing Landscape: issues, challenges and solutions. Proceedings of the 2015 BALEAP Conference. Reading: Garnet, pp. 205-216. 

Smyth, S., 1997. Sentence first verdict later: Courting the law on a university in-sessional English language course. ESP SIG Newsletter, 10, pp.15-20. 

Smyth, S. 1999. Communicating in legal English or taking the law into our own hands? ESP SIG Newsletter,15, pp. 6-15. 

Swales, J., 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge  
University Press. 

Tiersma, P. M. 1999. Legal language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.    


Copyright © 2024 BaleapSIG - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by GoDaddy Website Builder

  • Privacy Policy

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

DeclineAccept